Are all metal-poor stars of second-generation? [GA]

http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.02358


Hydrodynamical cosmological simulations predict that the metal-free Population III (Pop III) stars were likely very massive and, therefore, short-lived. However, they left their chemical imprint on their descendants, which can also have masses $ < 0.8 \mathrm {M_{\odot}}$ and still be alive today. The Milky Way stellar halo is one of the oldest and most metal-poor component of the Local Group and a peculiar class of stars, the so-called Carbon-Enhanced Metal-Poor (CEMP-no) stars, seem to be directly related to Pop III stars. We aim at revealing if all metal-poor halo stars are true second-generation stars or if they have also been enriched by the subsequent generations of normal (Pop II) stars. For this purpose, we compare the measured carbon and iron abundances of the metal-poor halo stars with the ones predicted by our simple parametric model, varying the pollution level from Pop III and normal stars. We find that only the most C-enhanced and Fe-poor stars enclose in their photospheres the pure imprint of Pop III stars, while, as the [C/Fe] decreases, the probability of being also polluted by normal Pop II stars increases.

Read this paper on arXiv…

I. Vanni, S. Salvadori and &. Skúladóttir
Fri, 5 May 23
56/67

Comments: 7 pages, 2 figures, accepted for publication in MemSAIt