http://arxiv.org/abs/2002.02490
This is the second of three papers describing an
absolute' calibration of the GONG magnetograph using an end-to-end simulation of its measurement process. In the first paper, we described the GONG instrument and ourend-to-end’ simulation of its measurement process. In this paper, we consider the theory of calibration, and magnetograph comparison in general, identifying some of the significant issues and pitfalls. The calibration of a magnetograph is a function of whether or not it preserves flux, independent of its spatial resolution. However, we find that the one-dimensional comparison methods most often used for magnetograph calibration and comparison will show dramatic differences between two magnetograms with differing spatial resolution, even if they both preserve flux. Some of the apparent disagreement between magnetograms found in the literature are likely a result of these instrumental resolution differences rather than any intrinsic calibration differences. To avoid them, spatial resolution must be carefully matched prior to comparing magnetograms or making calibration curves. In the third paper, we apply the lessons learned here to absolute calibration of GONG using our `end-to-end’ measurement simulation.
J. Plowman and T. Berger
Mon, 10 Feb 20
40/59
Comments: Submitted to Solar Physics, second of three papers (the other two are arXiv submissions 3034511 and 3034660)