Disk-corona modeling for spectral index and luminosity correlation of tidal disruption events [HEAP]

http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.02639


We present a relativistic disk-corona model for a steady state advective accretion disk to explain the UV to X-ray spectral index $\alpha_{\text{OX}}$ evolution of \textbf{four} tidal disruption event (TDE) sources XMMSL2J1446, XMMSL1J1404, XMMSL1J0740, \textbf{and AT2018fyk}. The viscous stress in our model depends on gas ($P_g$) and total ($P_t$) pressures as $\tau_{r\phi} \propto P_g^{\mu} P_t^{1-\mu}$, where $\mu$ is a constant. We compare various steady and time-dependent sub-Eddington TDE accretion models along with our disk-corona model to the observed $\alpha_{\text{OX}}$ of TDE sources and find that the disk-corona model agrees with the observations better than the other models. We find that $\mu$ is much smaller than unity for TDE sources XMMSL2J1446, XMMSL1J1404, and XMMSL1J0740. We also compare the relativistic model with a non-relativistic disk-corona model. The relativistic accretion dynamics reduce the spectral index relative to the non-relativistic accretion by increasing the energy transport to the corona. We estimate the mass accretion rate for all the sources and find that the observed luminosity follows a nearly linear relation with the mass accretion rate. The ratio of X-ray luminosity from the disk to the corona increases with the mass accretion rate. The observed $\alpha_{\text{OX}}$ shows positive and negative correlations with luminosity. The disk-corona model explains the negative correlation seen in the TDE sources XMMSL1J0740, XMMSL2J1446, and XMMSL1J1404. However, TDE AT2018fyk shows a positive correlation at higher luminosity and shows a better fit when a simple spherical adiabatic outflow model is added to the relativistic disk-corona model. Even though the disk luminosity dominates at a higher mass accretion rate, we show that the accretion models without a corona are unable to explain the observations, and the presence of a corona is essential.

Read this paper on arXiv…

T. Mageshwaran and S. Bhattacharyya
Fri, 5 May 23
59/67

Comments: 23 pages, 18 figures, 4 tables, accepted for publication in Physical Review D