Constraining Low-luminosity Gamma-Ray Bursts as Ultra-high-energy Cosmic Ray Sources Using GRB 060218 as a Proxy [HEAP]

http://arxiv.org/abs/2005.02417


We study the connection between low-luminosity gamma-ray bursts (llGRBs) and ultra-high-energy cosmic rays (UHECRs) using the canonical low-luminosity GRB 060218 as a proxy. We focus on the consequential synchrotron emission from electrons that are co-accelerated in the UHECR acceleration region, comparing this emission to observations. Both the prompt and afterglow phases are considered. For the prompt phase, we find that bright optical-UV emission is inevitable if the electrons are instantaneously injected into a power-law distribution. To enable acceleration of UHECRs while accommodating the optical-UV emission, it is necessary to keep the electrons from fast cooling (e.g., via reheating). Yet, the energetics of such models are independently constrained from our analysis of the afterglow. For the afterglow phase, we consider mildly relativistic outflows with bulk Lorentz factor $\Gamma \gtrsim 2$. Using thermal synchrotron radiation, we show that the kinetic energy of the afterglow blast wave of GRB 060218 was $\gtrsim 10$ times lower than the minimum energy required to satisfy the observed flux of UHECRs. Indeed, a blast wave with sufficient energy and where electrons carry 10-20\% of the energy as suggested by PIC simulations, would typically overshoot the available radio data at 3 days by more than an order of magnitude. If GRB 060218 is representative of the llGRB population as a whole, then our results show that their relativistic afterglows are unlikely to be the dominant sources of UHECRs. It also implies that for the prompt phase to be the main origin of UHECRs, a majority of the energy would need to escape as cosmic rays, neutrinos, or radiation before the onset of the afterglow, independent of the prompt emission mechanism. More generally, our study shows that synchrotron emission from thermal electrons is a powerful diagnostic of the physics of mildly relativistic shocks.

Read this paper on arXiv…

F. Samuelsson, D. Bégué, F. Ryde, et. al.
Thu, 7 May 20
21/62

Comments: 18 pages, 6 figures. Submitted to ApJ