Tidal radii of main sequence stars — II. Simulation methodology and the character of full tidal disruptions [GA]

http://arxiv.org/abs/1907.11883


This is the second in a series of papers presenting the results of fully general relativistic simulations of stellar tidal disruptions in which the stars’ initial states are realistic main-sequence models. We consider eight different stellar masses, from $0.15~{\rm M}\odot$ to $10~{\rm M}\odot$. In the first paper (Ryu et al. 2019a), we gave an overview of this program and discussed the principal observational implications of our work. Here we describe our calculational method and provide details about the outcomes of full disruptions. We find that, relative to the traditional order-of-magnitude estimate $r_{\rm t}$, the physical tidal radius of low-mass stars is larger by tens of percent, while for high-mass stars ($M_{\star} \gtrsim1~ {\rm M}\odot$) it is smaller by a factor $2-2.5$. The traditional estimate of the range of energies found in the debris is approximately accurate for low-mass stars, but is a factor $\sim 2$ too small for high-mass stars; in addition, the energy distribution for high-mass stars has significant wings. For all stars undergoing tidal encounters, we find that mass-loss continues for a long time because the ${\it instantaneous}$ tidal radius, the distance out to which the black hole’s tidal gravity competes with the instantaneous stellar gravity at the star’s surface, stays comparable to the distance to the black hole until the star has reached $O(10)~r{\rm t}$. These findings indicate significant failings in the popular “frozen-in” approximation.

Read this paper on arXiv…

T. Ryu, J. Krolik, T. Piran, et. al.
Tue, 30 Jul 19
61/79

Comments: 14 pages, 9 figures, 2 tables. Submitted to ApJ. Comments welcome!