http://arxiv.org/abs/1905.08303
Aims. We use Hermite splines to interpolate pressure and its derivatives simultaneously, thereby preserving mathematical relations between the derivatives. The method therefore guarantees that thermodynamic identities are obeyed even between mesh points. In addition, our method enables an estimation of the precision of the interpolation by comparing the Hermite-spline results with those of frequent cubic (B-) spline interpolation.
Methods. We have interpolated pressure as a function of temperature and density with quintic Hermite 2D-splines. The Hermite interpolation requires knowledge of pressure and its first and second derivatives at every mesh point. To obtain the partial derivatives at the mesh points, we used tabulated values if given or else thermodynamic equalities, or, if not available, values obtained by differentiating B-splines.
Results. The results were obtained with the grid of the SAHA-S equation-of-state (EOS) tables. The maximum $lg P$ difference lies in the range from $10^{-9}$ to $10^{-4}$, and $\Gamma_1$ difference varies from $10^{-9}$ to $10^{-3}$. Specifically, for the points of a solar model, the maximum differences are one order of magnitude smaller than the aforementioned values. The poorest precision is found in the dissociation and ionization regions, occurring at $T \sim 1.5\cdot 10^3 – 10^5$ K. The best precision is achieved at higher temperatures, $T>10^5$ K. To discuss the significance of the interpolation errors we compare them with the corresponding difference between two different equation-of-state formalisms, SAHA-S and OPAL 2005. We find that the interpolation errors of the pressure are a few orders of magnitude less than the differences from between the physical formalisms, which is particularly true for the solar-model points.
V. Baturin, W. Däppen, A. Oreshina, et. al.
Wed, 22 May 19
36/59
Comments: Accepted for publication in A&A
You must be logged in to post a comment.