http://arxiv.org/abs/1903.02401
We reexamine the results presented in [2019JCAP…02..019N] in which the properties of the noise residuals in the 40\,ms chirp domain of GW150914 were investigated. This paper confirmed the presence of strong (i.e., about 0.80) correlations between residual noise in the Hanford and Livingston detectors in the chirp domain as previously seen by [2017JCAP…08..013C] when using a numerical relativity template given in [PhysRevLett.116.061102]. It was also shown in [2019JCAP…02..019N] that a so-called maximum likelihood template can reduce these statistically significant cross-correlations. Here, we demonstrate that the reduction of correlation and statistical significance is due to (i) the use of a peculiar template which is qualitatively different from the properties of GW150914 originally published by LIGO, (ii) a suspicious MCMC chain, (iii) uncertainties in the matching of the maximum likelihood (ML) template to the data in the Fourier domain, and (iv) a biased estimation of the significance that gives counter-intuitive results. We show that rematching the maximum likelihood template to the data in the 0.2\,s domain containing the GW150914 signal restores these correlations at the level of $60\%$ of those found previously [2019JCAP…02..019N]. With necessary corrections, the probability given in [2019JCAP…02..019N] will decrease by more than one order of magnitude. Since the ML template is itself problematic, results associated with this template are illustrative rather than final.
A. Jackson, H. Liu and P. Naselsky
Thu, 7 Mar 19
79/82
Comments: 19 pages, 13 figures