http://arxiv.org/abs/1901.06947
The end-of-life disposal of Galileo satellites is needed to avoid collisions with operational spacecraft and to prevent the generation of space debris. Either disposal in stable graveyard orbits or disposal into the atmosphere exploiting eccentricity growth caused by lunisolar resonances are possible. However, there is a concern about the predictability of MEO orbits because of possible chaotic behaviour caused by the overlap of resonances. In this work, we investigate if Galileo disposal orbits are predictable and if safe disposal is possible under initial uncertainties. For this, we employ finite-time Lyapunov exponents (FTLE) and sensitivity analysis and compare these two methods regarding their practicality for analysing the predictability of disposal orbits. The results show that FTLE are not suitable for determining if an orbit behaves chaotically or not on the time scale of interest. Sensitivity analysis, on the other hand, can be used to quantify the effect of uncertainties on the orbital evolution and to determine if safe disposal is possible. In addition, we show that reliable re-entry disposal is feasible with a limited \Delta V budget. However, safe disposal into a graveyard orbit is not always feasible considering uncertainties in the disposal manoeuvre and dynamical model when the available \Delta V for disposal is low.
D. Gondelach, R. Armellin and A. Wittig
Wed, 23 Jan 19
97/111
Comments: 29 pages, 20 figures