Polarization Modeling and Predictions for DKIST Part 3: Focal Ratio and Thermal Dependencies of Spectral Polarization Fringes and Optic Retardance [IMA]

http://arxiv.org/abs/1803.08987


Data products from high spectral resolution astronomical polarimeters are often limited by fringes. Fringes can skew derived magnetic field properties from spectropolarimetric data. Fringe removal algorithms can also corrupt the data if the fringes and object signals are too similar. For some narrow-band imaging polarimeters, fringes change the calibration retarder properties, and dominate the calibration errors. Systems-level engineering tools for polarimetric instrumentation require accurate predictions of fringe amplitudes, periods for transmission, diattenuation and retardance. The relevant instabilities caused by environmental, thermal and optical properties can be modeled and mitigation tools developed. We create spectral polarization fringe amplitude and temporal instability predictions by applying the Berreman calculus and simple interferrometric calculations to optics in beams of varying F/ number. We then apply the formalism to super-achromatic six crystal retarders in converging beams under beam thermal loading in outdoor environmental conditions for two of the worlds largest observatories: the 10m Keck telescope and the Daniel K. Inouye Solar Telescope (DKIST). DKIST will produce a 300 Watt optical beam which has imposed stringent requirements on the large diameter six-crystal retarders, dichroic beamsplitters and internal optics. DKIST retarders are used in a converging beams with F/ ratios between 8 and 62. The fringe spectral periods, amplitudes and thermal models of retarder behavior assisted DKIST optical designs and calibration plans with future application to many astronomical spectropolarimeters. The Low Resolution Imaging Spectrograph with polarimetry (LRISp) instrument at Keck also uses six-crystal retarders in a converging F/ 13 beam in a Cassegrain focus exposed to summit environmental conditions providing observational verification of our predictions.

Read this paper on arXiv…

D. Harrington and S. Sueoka
Wed, 28 Mar 18
53/148

Comments: Accepted for publication in SPIE JATIS