The $H_0$ and $σ_8$ tensions and the scale invariant spectrum [CEA]

http://arxiv.org/abs/1712.00677


In a previous communication we showed that a joint analysis of Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) data and the current measurement of the local expansion rate favours a model with a scale invariant spectrum (HZ) over the minimal $\Lambda$CDM scenario provided that the effective number of relativistic degrees of freedom, $N_{eff}$, is taken as a free parameter. Such a result is basically obtained due to the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) value of the Hubble constant, $H_0 = 73.24 \pm 1.74$ $\rm{km.s^{-1}.Mpc^{-1}}$ (68\% C.L.), as the CMB data alone discard the HZ+$N_{eff}$ model. Although such a model is not physically motivated by current scenarios of the early universe, observations pointing to a scale invariant spectrum may indicate that the origin of cosmic perturbations lies in an unknown physical process. Here, we extend the previous results performing a Bayesian analysis using joint CMB, HST, and Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO) measurements. In order to take into account the well-known tension on the value of the fluctuation amplitude parameter, $\sigma_8$, we also consider Cluster Number counts (CN) and Weak Lensing (WL) data. We use two different samples of BAO data, which are obtained using two-point spatial (BAO 2PCF) and angular (BAO 2PACF) correlation functions. Our results show that a joint CMB+HST+BAO 2PCF analysis discards the HZP$+N_{eff}$ model with respect to the minimal $\Lambda$CDM scenario whereas the combination CMB+HST+BAO 2PACF favours the former model, even when an extended dataset with NC and WL is considered.

Read this paper on arXiv…

M. Benetti, L. Graef and J. Alcaniz
Tue, 5 Dec 17
18/96

Comments: 4 pages