A de Sitter limit analysis for dark energy and modified gravity models [CL]

http://arxiv.org/abs/1705.01960


The effective field theory of dark energy and modified gravity is supposed to well describe, at low energies, the behaviour of the gravity modifications due to one extra scalar degree of freedom. The usual curvature perturbation is very useful when studying the conditions for the avoidance of ghost instabilities as well as the positivity of the squared speeds of propagation for both the scalar and tensor modes, or the St\”uckelberg field performs perfectly when investigating the evolution of linear perturbations. We show that the viable parameters space identified by requiring no-ghost instabilities and positive squared speeds of propagation does not change by performing a field redefinition, while the requirement of the avoidance of tachyonic instability might instead be different. Therefore, we find interesting to associate to the general modified gravity theory described in the effective field theory framework, a perturbation field which will inherit the whole properties of the theory. In the present paper we address the following questions: 1) how can we define such a field? and 2) what is the mass of such a field as the background approaches a final de Sitter state? We define a gauge invariant quantity which identifies the density of the dark energy perturbation field valid for any background. We derive the mass associated to the gauge invariant dark energy field on a de Sitter background, which we retain to be still a good approximation also at very low redshift ($z\simeq 0$). On this background we also investigate the value of the speed of propagation and we find that there exist classes of theories which admit a non-vanishing speed of propagation, even among the Horndeski model, for which in literature it has previously been found a zero speed. We finally apply our results to specific well known models.

Read this paper on arXiv…

A. Felice, N. Frusciante and G. Papadomanolakis
Mon, 8 May 17
36/54

Comments: 22 pages