http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.03911
Gaussian Process (GP) has gained much attention in cosmology due to its ability to reconstruct cosmological data in a model-independent manner. In this study, we compare two methods for GP kernel selection: Approximate Bayesian Computation (ABC) Rejection and nested sampling. We analyze three types of data: cosmic Chronometer data (CC), Type Ia Supernovae (SNIa), and Gamma Ray Burst (GRB), using five kernel functions. To evaluate the differences between kernel functions, we assess the strength of evidence using Bayes factors. Our results show that, for ABC Rejection, the Mat\’ern kernel with $\nu$=5/2 (M52 kernel) outperformes the commonly used Radial Basis Function (RBF) kernel in approximating all three datasets. Bayes factors indicate that the M52 kernel typically supports the observed data better than the RBF kernel, but with no clear advantage over other alternatives. However, nested sampling gives different results, with the M52 kernel losing its advantage. Nevertheless, Bayes factors indicate no significant dependence of the data on each kernel.
H. Zhang, Y. Wang, T. Zhang, et. al.
Tue, 11 Apr 23
29/63
Comments: 15 pages, 4 tables, 6 figures, accepted for publication in ApJS. We draw a new conclusion which is different from the standard ABC-related methods(e.g. ABC-SMC) in kernel selection for Gaussian Process
You must be logged in to post a comment.