Tests of general relativity in the nonlinear regime: a parametrized plunge-merger-ringdown gravitational waveform model [CL]

http://arxiv.org/abs/2212.09655


The plunge-merger stage of the binary-black-hole (BBH) coalescence, when the bodies’ velocities reach a large fraction of the speed of light and the gravitational-wave (GW) luminosity peaks, provides a unique opportunity to probe gravity in the dynamical and nonlinear regime. How much do the predictions of general relativity differ from the ones in other theories of gravity for this stage of the binary evolution? To address this question, we develop a parametrized waveform model, within the effective-one-body formalism, that allows for deviations from general relativity in the plunge-merger-ringdown stage. As first step, we focus on nonprecessing-spin, quasicircular BBHs. In comparison to previous works, for each GW mode, our model can modify, with respect to general-relativistic predictions, the instant at which the amplitude peaks, the instantaneous frequency at this time instant, and the value of the peak amplitude. We use this waveform model to explore several questions considering both synthetic-data injections and two GW signals. In particular, we find that deviations from the peak GW amplitude and instantaneous frequency can be constrained to about 20$\%$ with GW150914. Alarmingly, we find that GW200129_065458 shows a strong violation of general relativity. We interpret this result as a false violation, either due to waveform systematics (mismodeling of spin precession) or due to data-quality issues depending on one’s interpretation of this event. This illustrates the use of parametrized waveform models as tools to investigate systematic errors in plain general relativity. The results with GW200129_065458 also vividly demonstrate the importance of waveform systematics and of glitch mitigation procedures when interpreting tests of general relativity with current GW observations.

Read this paper on arXiv…

E. Maggio, H. Silva, A. Buonanno, et. al.
Tue, 20 Dec 22
74/97

Comments: 16+4 pages, 14 figures