http://arxiv.org/abs/2209.00640

One of the major aims of gravitational wave astronomy is to observationally test the Kerr nature of black holes. The strongest such test, with minimal additional assumptions, is provided by observations of multiple ringdown modes, also known as black hole spectroscopy. For the gravitational wave merger event GW190521, we have previously claimed the detection of two ringdown modes emitted by the remnant black hole. In this paper we provide further evidence for the detection of multiple ringdown modes from this event. We analyze the recovery of simulated gravitational wave signals designed to replicate the ringdown properties of GW190521. We quantify how often our detection statistic reports strong evidence for a sub-dominant $(\ell,m,n)=(3,3,0)$ ringdown mode, even when no such mode is present in the simulated signal. We find this only occurs with a probability $\sim 0.02$, which is consistent with a Bayes factor of $56 \pm 1$ (1$\sigma$ uncertainty) found for GW190521. We also quantify our agnostic analysis of GW190521, in which no relationship is assumed between ringdown modes, and find that less than 1 in 500 simulated signals without a $(3,3,0)$ mode yield a result as significant as GW190521. Conversely, we verify that when simulated signals do have an observable $(3,3,0)$ mode they consistently yield a strong evidence and significant agnostic results. We also find that simulated GW190521-like signals with a $(3,3,0)$ mode present yield tight constraints on deviations of that mode from Kerr, whereas constraints on the $(2,2,1)$ overtone of the dominant mode yield wide constraints that are not consistent with Kerr. These results on simulated signals are similar to what we find for GW190521. Our results strongly support our previous conclusion that the gravitational wave signal from GW190521 contains an observable sub-dominant $(\ell,m,n)=(3,3,0)$ mode.

Read this paper on arXiv…

C. Capano, J. Abedi, S. Kastha, et. al.
Fri, 2 Sep 22
19/62

Comments: 14 pages, 8 figures