http://arxiv.org/abs/2208.13674
Measuring blackbody parameters for objects hotter than a few 10^4K with optical data alone is common in many astrophysical studies. However this process is prone to large errors because at those temperatures the optical bands are mostly sampling the Rayleigh-Jeans tail of the spectrum. Here we quantify these errors by simulating different blackbodies, sampling them in various bands with realistic measurement errors, and re-fitting them to blackbodies using two different methods and two different priors. We find that when using only optical data, log-uniform priors perform better than uniform priors. Still, measured temperatures of blackbodies above ~35,000K can be wrong by ~10,000K, and only lower limits can be obtained for temperatures of blackbodies hotter than ~50,000K. Bolometric luminosities estimated from optical-only blackbody fits can be wrong by factors of 3-5. When adding space-based ultraviolet data, these errors shrink significantly. For when such data are not available, we provide plots and tables of the distributions of true temperatures that can result in various measured temperatures. It is important to take these distributions into account as systematic uncertainties when fitting hot blackbodies with optical data alone.
I. Arcavi
Tue, 30 Aug 22
11/76
Comments: To be re-submmited to AAS Journals, following the first round of referee remarks. Comments welcome
You must be logged in to post a comment.