http://arxiv.org/abs/2208.12371
It has long been uncertain how effective the dust-corrected H$\alpha$-to-UV luminosity ratio ($L(\rm H\alpha)/L(\rm UV)$) is in probing bursty SFHs for high-redshift galaxies. To address this issue, we present a statistical analysis of the resolved distribution of star-formation-rate surface density ($\Sigma_{\rm SFR}$) as well as stellar age and their correlations with the globally measured $L(\rm H\alpha)/L(\rm UV)$ for a sample of 310 star-forming galaxies in two redshift bins of $1.37<z<1.70$ and $2.09<z<2.61$ observed by the MOSDEF survey. We use the multi-waveband CANDELS/3D-HST imaging of MOSDEF galaxies to construct $\Sigma_{\rm SFR}$ and stellar age maps. We also analyze the composite rest-frame far-UV spectra of a subsample of MOSDEF targets obtained by the Keck-LRIS, which includes 124 star-forming galaxies at redshifts $1.4<z<2.6$, to examine the average stellar population properties, and the strength of age-sensitive FUV spectral features in bins of $L(\rm H\alpha)/L(\rm UV)$. We find no evidence that galaxies with higher $L(\rm H\alpha)/L(\rm UV)$ are undergoing a burst of star formation based on the distribution of $\Sigma_{\rm SFR}$ and stellar age as well as the strengths of Siiv$\lambda\lambda1393,1402$ and Civ$\lambda\lambda1548,1550$ P-Cygni features from massive stars. Our results suggest that the $L(\rm H\alpha)/L(\rm UV)$ ratio is not a reliable tracer of bursty SFHs for typical star-forming galaxies at high redshift. We also study the variations observed in the strength of the nebular Heii$\lambda1640$ emission between the $L(\rm H\alpha)/L(\rm UV)$ subsamples. We find that variations in the upper-mass limit of the IMF cannot fully account for all the observed difference in the HeII emission between the $L(\rm H\alpha)/L(\rm UV)$ subsamples, and that another source of He$^{+}$ ionizing photons, such as X-ray binaries, may be needed to explain such a difference.
S. Rezaee, N. Reddy, M. Topping, et. al.
Mon, 29 Aug 22
43/49
Comments: 15 pages, 9 figures, Submitted to the Monthly Notices of the royal astronomical society
You must be logged in to post a comment.