Flexible Models for Galaxy Star Formation Histories Both Shift and Scramble the Optical Color-M/L Relationship [GA]

http://arxiv.org/abs/2208.12295


The remarkably tight relationship between optical color and stellar mass-to-light ratio ($M_/L$) in galaxies is widely used for efficient stellar mass estimates. However, it has remained unclear whether this low scatter comes from a natural order in the galaxy population, or whether it is driven by simple relationships in the models used to describe them. In this work we investigate the origins of the relationship by contrasting the derived relationship from a simple 4-parameter physical model with a more sophisticated 14-dimensional Prospector-$\alpha$ model including nonparametric star formation histories. We apply these models to 63,430 galaxies at $0.5<z<3$ from the 3D-HST survey and fit the results with a hierarchical Bayesian model (HBM) for the population distribution in the $(g-r)$–$\log(M/L_g)$ plane. We find that Prospector-$\alpha$ infers systematically higher $M_/L$ by 0.12 dex, a result of the nonparametric star formation history producing older ages. Prospector-$\alpha$ also infers systematically redder rest-frame $(g-r)$ by 0.06 dex owing to the nebular emission. Surprisingly, we observe similar average color–$M_/L$ relationships for the two models due to the combined effects of the $M_/L$ and $(g-r)$ offsets. Nevertheless, Prospector-$\alpha$ produces a much looser color-M/L relationship with a scatter of 0.28 dex compared to the simple model of 0.12 dex. Also, unlike the simple model, the Prospector-$\alpha$ model shows a substantial redshift evolution in the relationship due to stellar aging. Finally, we demonstrate that the HBM produces substantial shrinkage in the individual posteriors for faint galaxies, an important first step towards using the observed galaxy population directly to inform the priors in galaxy SED-fitting.

Read this paper on arXiv…

Y. Li and J. Leja
Mon, 29 Aug 22
16/49

Comments: 20 pages, 12 figures, resubmitted to ApJ after responding to the first round of referee comments