http://arxiv.org/abs/2204.09705
Samples of young type Ia supernovae have shown `early excess’ emission in a few cases. Similar excesses are predicted by some explosion and progenitor scenarios and hence can provide important clues regarding the origin of thermonuclear supernovae. They are however, only predicted to last up to the first few days following explosion. It is therefore unclear whether such scenarios are intrinsically rare or if the relatively small sample size simply reflects the difficulty in obtaining sufficiently early detections. To that end, we perform toy simulations covering a range of survey depths and cadences, and investigate the efficiency with which young type Ia supernovae are recovered. As input for our simulations, we use models that broadly cover the range of predicted luminosities. Based on our simulations, we find that in a typical three day cadence survey, only $\sim$10% of type Ia supernovae would be detected early enough to rule out the presence of an excess. A two day cadence however, should see this increase to $\sim$15%. We find comparable results from more detailed simulations of the Zwicky Transient Facility surveys. Using the recovery efficiencies from these detailed simulations, we investigate the number of young type Ia supernovae expected to be discovered assuming some fraction of the population come from scenarios producing an excess at early times. Comparing the results of our simulations to observations, we find the intrinsic fraction of type Ia supernovae with early flux excesses is $\sim28^{+13}_{-11}%$%.
M. Magee, C. Cuddy, K. Maguire, et. al.
Fri, 22 Apr 22
35/64
Comments: 16 pages, 15 figures, 2 tables. Accepted for publication in MNRAS
You must be logged in to post a comment.