Reply to: Three papers regarding the origin of GN-z11-flash [HEAP]

http://arxiv.org/abs/2112.07802


In Jiang et al., we detected a bright flash (hereafter GN-z11-flash) that appeared as compact continuum emission during our Keck MOSFIRE observations of the galaxy GN-z11 at z ~ 11. We performed a comprehensive analysis of the origin of the flash using all available information and our current understanding of known man-made objects or moving objects in the solar system. We found that GN-z11-flash was likely a rest-frame UV flash associated with a long gamma-ray burst (GRB) from GN-z11. Recently, Steinhardt et al., Michalowski et al., and Nir et al. reported that GN-z11-flash was more likely from a satellite. While one cannot completely rule out the possibility of unknown satellites (or debris), we find that either the chance probabilities of being a satellite estimated by these authors have been largely overestimated or their identified satellites have been ruled out in our original analysis. Our new calculations show that the probability of GN-z11-flash being a satellite is still lower than that of it being a signal originated from GN-z11.

Read this paper on arXiv…

L. Jiang, S. Wang, B. Zhang, et. al.
Thu, 16 Dec 21
56/83

Comments: Published in Nature Astronomy Matters Arising 5, 998-1000, 2021; Authors’ version; Some content slightly overlaps with our previous reply in arXiv:2102.01239