http://arxiv.org/abs/2107.03723
We present an analysis of the spatial clustering of 695 Ly$\alpha$-emitting galaxies (LAE) in the MUSE-Wide survey. All objects have spectroscopically confirmed redshifts in the range $3.3<z<6$. We employ the K-estimator of Adelberger et al. (2005), adapted and optimized for our sample. We also explore the standard two-point correlation function approach, which is however less suited for a pencil-beam survey such as ours. The results from both approaches are consistent. We parametrize the clustering properties by, (i) modelling the clustering signal with a power law (PL), and (ii) adopting a Halo Occupation Distribution (HOD) model. Applying HOD modeling, we infer a large-scale bias of $b_{\rm{HOD}}=2.80^{+0.38}{-0.38}$ at a median redshift of the number of galaxy pairs $\langle z{\rm pair}\rangle\simeq3.82$, while the PL analysis results in $b_{\rm{PL}}=3.03^{+1.51}{-0.52}$ ($r_0=3.60^{+3.10}{-0.90}\;h^{-1}$Mpc and $\gamma=1.30^{+0.36}{-0.45}$). The implied typical dark matter halo (DMH) mass is $\log(M{\rm{DMH}}/[h^{-1}\rm{M}\odot])=11.34^{+0.23}{-0.27}$. We study possible dependencies of the clustering signal on object properties by bisecting the sample into disjoint subsets, considering Ly$\alpha$ luminosity, UV absolute magnitude, Ly$\alpha$ equivalent width, and redshift as variables. We find a suggestive trend of more luminous Ly$\alpha$ emitters residing in more massive DMHs than their lower Ly$\alpha$ luminosity counterparts. We also compare our results to mock LAE catalogs based on a semi-analytic model of galaxy formation and find a stronger clustering signal than in our observed sample. By adopting a galaxy-conserving model we estimate that the LAEs in the MUSE-Wide survey will typically evolve into galaxies hosted by halos of $\log(M_{\rm{DMH}}/[h^{-1}\rm{M}_\odot])\approx13.5$ at redshift zero, suggesting that we observe the ancestors of present-day galaxy groups.
Y. Alonso, M. Krumpe, L. Wisotzki, et. al.
Fri, 9 Jul 21
48/62
Comments: Accepted for publication in A&A. 22 pages, 20 figures, 4 tables
You must be logged in to post a comment.