http://arxiv.org/abs/2005.13464
In this brief reply we respond to the note of Bertolami and Gomes (arXiv:2005.03968) on our recent paper (arXiv:2003.10154).
P. Avelino
Thu, 28 May 20
41/55
Comments: 2 pages, no figures
You must be logged in to post a comment.