http://arxiv.org/abs/2005.03515
Redshift $z=9–10$ object selection is the effective limit of Hubble Space Telescope imaging capability, even when confirmed with Spitzer. If only a few photometry data points are available, it becomes attractive to add criteria based on their morphology in these J- and H-band images.
One could do so through visual inspection, a size criterion, or alternate morphometrics. We explore a vetted sample of BoRG $z\sim9$ and $z\sim10$ candidate galaxies and the object rejected by Morishita+ (2018) to explore the utility of a size criterion in z=9-10 candidate selection. A stringent, PSF-corrected effective radius criterion ($r_e<0\farcs3$) would result in the rejection of 65-70\% of the interlopers visually rejected by Morishita+. It may also remove up to $\sim20$\% of bona-fide brightest ($L>>L^$) z=9 or 10 candidates from a BoRG selected sample based on the Mason+ (2015) luminosity functions, assuming the Holwerda+ (2015) $z\sim9$ size-luminosity relation. We argue that including a size constraint in lieu of a visual inspection may serve in wide-field searches for these objects in e.g. EUCLID or HST archival imaging with the understanding that some brightest ($L>>L^$) candidates may be missed.
The sizes of the candidates found by Morishita+ (2018) follow the expected size distribution of $z\sim9$ for bright galaxies, consistent with the lognormal in Shibuya+ (2015) and single objects. Two candidates show high star-formation surface density ($\Sigma_{SFR} > 25 M_\odot/kpc^2$) and all merit further investigation and follow-up observations.
B. Holwerda, J. Bridge, R. Steele, et. al.
Fri, 8 May 20
61/72
Comments: 9 Figures, 1 table, 13 pages, accepted for publication in The Astronomical Journal