http://arxiv.org/abs/1912.05557
Repp and Szapudi (2019) present a physically-motivated galaxy bias model which remains physical in low-density regions and which also provides a better fit to simulation data than do typical survey-analysis bias models. Given plausible simplifying assumptions, the physics of this model (surprisingly) proves to be analogous to the Ising model of statistical mechanics. In the present work we present a method of testing this Ising bias model against empirical galaxy survey data. Using this method, we compare our model (as well as three reference models — linear, quadratic, and logarithmic) to SDSS, 6dFGS, and COSMOS2015 results, finding that for spectroscopic redshift surveys, the Ising bias model provides a superior fit compared to the reference models. Photometric redshifts, on the other hand, introduce enough error into the radial coordinate that none of the models yields a good fit. A physically meaningful galaxy bias model is necessary for optimal extraction of cosmological information from dense galaxy surveys such as Euclid and WFIRST.
A. Repp and I. Szapudi
Fri, 13 Dec 19
48/75
Comments: 22 pages, 16 figures; submitted to MNRAS
You must be logged in to post a comment.