http://arxiv.org/abs/1711.10369
We compare the cosmology of conformal gravity (CG), (Mannheim 2006), to $\Lambda$CDM. CG cosmology has repulsive matter and radiation on cosmological scales, while retaining attractive gravity at local scales. Mannheim (2003) finds that CG agrees with $\Lambda$CDM for supernova data at redshifts $z<1$. We use GRBs and quasars as standard candles to contrast these models in the redshift range $0<z<8$. We find CG deviates significantly from $\Lambda$CDM at high redshift and that $\Lambda$CDM is favoured by the data with $\Delta\chi^2=48$. Mannheim’s model has a bounded dark energy contribution, but we identify a $\lambda$ fine-tuning problem and a cosmic coincidence problem.
C. Roberts, K. Horne, A. Hodson, et. al.
Wed, 29 Nov 17
2/69
Comments: 6 pages, 2 tables, 4 figures
You must be logged in to post a comment.