http://arxiv.org/abs/1701.04836
Although for many solar physics problems the desirable or meaningful boundary is the radial component of the magnetic field $B_{\rm r}$, the most readily available measurement is the component of the magnetic field along the line-of-sight to the observer, $B_{\rm los}$. As this component is only equal to the radial component where the viewing angle is exactly zero, some approximation is required to estimate $B_{\rm r}$ at all other observed locations. In this study, a common approximation known as the “$\mu$-correction”, which assumes all photospheric field to be radial, is compared to a method which invokes computing a potential field that matches the observed $B_{\rm los}$, from which the potential field radial component, $B_{\rm r}^{\rm pot}$ is recovered. We demonstrate that in regions that are truly dominated by radially-oriented field at the resolution of the data employed, the $\mu$-correction performs acceptably if not better than the potential-field approach. However, it is also shown that for any solar structure which includes horizontal fields, i.e. active regions, the potential-field method better recovers both the strength of the radial field and the location of magnetic neutral line.
K. Leka, G. Barnes and E. Wagner
Thu, 19 Jan 17
25/42
Comments: Accepted for publication in Solar Physics