Non-linear Ion-Wake Excitation by the Time-Asymmetric Electron Wakefields of Intense Energy Sources with applications to the Crunch-in regime [CL]

http://arxiv.org/abs/1612.03520


A model for the excitation of a non-linear ion-wake mode by a train of plasma electron oscillations in the non-linear time-asymmetric regime is developed using analytical theory and particle-in-cell based computational solutions. The ion-wake is shown to be a driven non-linear ion-acoustic wave in the form of a cylindrical ion-soliton. The near-void and radially-outwards propagating ion-wake channel of a few plasma skin-depth radius, is explored for application to “Crunch-in” regime of positron acceleration. The coupling from the electron wakefield mode to the ion-mode dictates the long-term evolution of the plasma and the time for its relaxation back to an equilibrium, limiting the repetition-rate of a plasma accelerator. Using an analytical model it is shown that it is the time asymmetric phases of the oscillating radial electric fields of the nearly-stationary electron bubble that excite time-averaged inertial ion motion radially. The electron compression in the back of the bubble sucks-in the ions whereas the space-charge within the bubble cavity expels them, driving a cylindrical ion-soliton structure with on-axis and bubble-edge density-spikes. Once formed, the channel-edge density-spike is sustained over the length of the plasma and driven radially outwards by the thermal pressure of the wake energy in electrons. Its channel-like structure is independent of the energy-source, electromagnetic wave or particle beam, driving the bubble electron wake. Particle-In-Cell simulations are used to study the ion-wake soliton structure, its driven propagation and its use for positron acceleration in the “Crunch-in” regime.

Read this paper on arXiv…

A. Sahai
Tue, 13 Dec 16
67/77

Comments: Crunch-in regime strongly contradicts the established conclusions of ZERO focusing fields in a hollow-channel (claimed and presented in several PRL, PoP, PRE and Nature papers). Since this entirely opposes and goes against established conclusions of over 20 years old work, severely damaging to the reputations of the senior physicists, it is not being allowed through the peer-review process