http://arxiv.org/abs/1701.04407
We use EAGLE to explore the effect galaxy mergers have on the stellar specific angular momentum of galaxies, $j_{\rm stars}$. We characterise mergers into: dry (gas-poor)/wet (gas-rich), major/minor, and by different spin alignments and orbital parameters. Our wet (dry) mergers have an average neutral gas fraction (i.e. the ratio between the neutral gas and the stellar masses of the merging system) of $1.1$ ($0.02$), while minor (major) mergers are those with stellar mass ratios between the secondary and primary galaxy in the range $0.1-0.3$ ($\ge 0.3$). We correlate the positions of galaxies in the $j_{\rm stars}$-stellar mass plane at $z=0$ with their merger history, and find that galaxies of low spins suffered dry mergers, while galaxies of normal/high spins suffered predominantly wet mergers, if any at all. The radial $j_{\rm stars}$ profiles of galaxies that went through dry mergers are deficient by $\approx 0.3$~dex at $r\lesssim 10\,r_{50}$ compared to galaxies that went through wet mergers. By studying galaxies before and after mergers, we find that dry mergers reduce $j_{\rm stars}$ by $\approx 30$%, while wet mergers increase it by $\approx 10$%, on average. The latter is connected to the build-up of the central stellar over-density by newly formed stars of high rotational speed. Moving from minor to major mergers mostly accentuates the effects above. When the spin vectors of the galaxies prior to the dry merger are misaligned, $j_{\rm stars}$ decreases to a greater magnitude, while in wet mergers, co-rotation and high orbital angular momentum lead to the largest $j_{\rm stars}$ increase. We make predictions for what would be the observational signatures in the mean $j_{\rm stars}$ profiles driven by dry mergers: (i) shallow radial profiles and (ii) profiles that continue to rise beyond $\approx 10\,r_{50}$, both of which are significantly different from spiral galaxies.
C. Lagos, A. Stevens, R. Bower, et. al.
Wed, 18 Jan 17
34/61
Comments: Submitted to MNRAS. 21 pages, 21 figures. Main body of the paper is 16 pages with 5 of appendices. Comments are welcomed
You must be logged in to post a comment.