http://arxiv.org/abs/1612.06794
Aims: This work is the first stage of a campaign to search for IMBHs, in low luminosity AGN (LLAGN) and dwarf galaxies. An additional, and equally important, aim of this pilot study is to investigate the consistency between the predictions of several BH scaling relations and the fundamental plane of black hole activity (FP-BH). Methods: We use X-ray and radio luminosity relations in accreting BHs, along with the latest scaling relations between the mass of the central black hole (MBH) and the properties of its host spheroid, to predict MBH in seven LLAGN, that were previously reported to be in the IMBH regime. Namely, we use the recently re-evaluated MBH – Msph (Msph : spheroid absolute magnitude at 3.6 microm) scaling relation for spiral galaxies, the MBH – nsph (nsph : major axis Sersic index of the bulge) relation, the MBH – PA (PA: pitch angle) relation and the FP-BH for weakly accreting BHs, to independently estimate MBH in all seven galaxies. Results: We find that all LLAGN in our list have low-mass central black holes – with log MBH/Msol~6.5 on average – but they are, not IMBHs. All 4 methods used predicted consistent BH masses, in the 1sigma range. Furthermore, we report that, in contrast to previous classification, galaxy NGC 4470 is bulge-less, and cast doubts on the AGN classification of NGC 3507. Conclusions: We find that our latest, state-of-the-art techniques for bulge magnitude & Sersic index computations and the most recent updates of the MBH – Lsph, MBH – nsph , MBH – PA relations and the FP-BH produce consistent results in the low mass regime. We establish a multiple method approach for predicting BH masses in the regime where their spheres-of- grav. influence cannot be spatially resolved. Our approach mitigates against outliers from any one relation and provides a more robust average prediction. We will use our new method to revisit more IMBH candidates in LLAGN
F. Koliopanos, B. Ciambur, A. Graham, et. al.
Wed, 21 Dec 16
34/67
Comments: Accepted by A&A: 14 pages, 4 figures, 2 tables
You must be logged in to post a comment.