http://arxiv.org/abs/1507.05617
Comparisons between observed and predicted strong lensing properties of galaxy clusters have been routinely used to claim either tension or consistency with $\Lambda$CDM cosmology. However, standard approaches to such cosmological tests are unable to quantify the preference for one cosmology over another. We advocate using a `weighted’ variant of approximate Bayesian computation (ABC), whereby the parameters of the scaling relation between Einstein radii and cluster mass, $\alpha$ and $\beta$, are treated as summary statistics. We demonstrate, for the first time, a method of estimating the likelihood of the data under the $\Lambda$CDM framework, using the X-ray selected $z>0.5$ MACS clusters as a case in point and employing both N-body and hydrodynamic simulations of clusters. We investigate the uncertainty in the calculated likelihood, and consequential ability to compare competing cosmologies, that arises from incomplete descriptions of baryonic processes, discrepancies in cluster selection criteria, redshift distribution, and dynamical state. The relation between triaxial cluster masses at various overdensities provide a promising alternative to the strong lensing test.
M. Killedar, S. Borgani, D. Fabjan, et. al.
Wed, 22 Jul 15
34/59
Comments: 15 pages, 6 figures, 1 table, submitted to MNRAS, comments welcome
You must be logged in to post a comment.