http://arxiv.org/abs/1802.04872

What cosmic ray ionisation rate is required such that a non-ideal magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) simulation of a collapsing molecular cloud will follow the same evolutionary path as an ideal MHD simulation or as a purely hydrodynamics simulation? To investigate this question, we perform three-dimensional smoothed particle non-ideal magnetohydrodynamics simulations of the gravitational collapse of rotating, one solar mass, magnetised molecular cloud cores, that include Ohmic resistivity, ambipolar diffusion, and the Hall effect. We assume a uniform grain size of $a_\text{g} = 0.1\mu$m, and our free parameter is the cosmic ray ionisation rate, $\zeta_\text{cr}$. We evolve our models, where possible, until they have produced a first hydrostatic core. Models with $\zeta_\text{cr}\gtrsim10^{-13}$ s$^{-1}$ are indistinguishable from ideal MHD models and the evolution of the model with $\zeta_\text{cr}=10^{-14}$ s$^{-1}$ matches the evolution of the ideal MHD model within one per cent when considering maximum density, magnetic energy, and maximum magnetic field strength as a function of time; these results are independent of $a_\text{g}$. Models with very low ionisation rates ($\zeta_\text{cr}\lesssim10^{-24}$ s$^{-1}$) are required to approach hydrodynamical collapse, and even lower ionisation rates may be required for larger $a_\text{g}$. Thus, it is possible to reproduce ideal MHD and purely hydrodynamical collapses using non-ideal MHD given an appropriate cosmic ray ionisation rate. However, realistic cosmic ray ionisation rates approach neither limit, thus non-ideal MHD cannot be neglected in star formation simulations.

Read this paper on arXiv…

J. Wurster, M. Bate and D. Price

Thu, 15 Feb 18

46/48

Comments: 13 pages, 15 figures, accepted for publication in MNRAS

### Like this:

Like Loading...

*Related*