Characterising dark matter haloes with computer vision [CEA]

http://arxiv.org/abs/1704.05072


This work explores the ability of computer vision algorithms to characterise dark matter haloes formed in different models of structure formation. We produce surface mass density maps of the most massive haloes in a suite of eight numerical simulations, all based on the same initial conditions, but implementing different models of gravity. This suite includes a standard $\Lambda$CDM model, two variations of $f(R)$-gravity, two variations of Symmetron gravity and three Dvali, Gabadadze and Porrati (DGP) models. We use the publicly available WND-CHARM algorithm to extract 2919 image features from either the raw pixel intensities of the maps, or from a variety of image transformations including Fourier, Wavelet, Chebyshev and Edge transformations. After discarding the most degenerate models, we achieve more than 60% single-image classification success rate in distinguishing the four different models of gravity while using a simple weighted neighbour distance (WND) to define our classification metric. This number can be increased to more than 70% if additional information, such as a rough estimate of the halo mass, is included. We find that the classification success steeply declines when the noise level in the images is increased, but that this trend can be largely reduced by smoothing the noisy data. We find Zernike moments of the Fourier transformation of either the raw image or its Wavelet transformation to be the most descriptive feature, followed by the Gini coefficient of several transformations and the Haralick and Tamura textures of the raw pixel data eventually pre-processed by an Edge transformation. The proposed methodology is general and does not only apply to the characterisation of modified gravity models, but can be used to classify any set of models which show variations in the 2D morphology of their respective structure.

Read this paper on arXiv…

J. Merten, Q. Llorens and H. Winther
Wed, 19 Apr 17
40/62

Comments: 19 pages, 6 figures, 16 tables. Submitted to MNRAS, comments welcome